Jump to content

Jimmy Paredes long-term


Brooks The Great

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Let's say that this hot hitting Paredes has exhibited since his activation is a result of him having put everything together, and the Orioles decide he's a part of the future.

How would you guys get him the maximum number of at bats in the starting lineup if you are Buck Showalter?

He is batting second today, right? That is exactly what he is doing.

But there is still a vast majority that think Lough is more valuable:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you a bit over the top.

One is an infielder and the other an outfielder, hard to compare the two.

What? Well then I think you have a poo-poo face.

How many roster spots do you think we have sitting around? They are related actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say that this hot hitting Paredes has exhibited since his activation is a result of him having put everything together, and the Orioles decide he's a part of the future.

How would you guys get him the maximum number of at bats in the starting lineup if you are Buck Showalter?

Why would I want to maximize his at bats? His MLB career thus far has resulted in a .620 OPS, over a win below replacement, and he doesn't appear to be a plus defender at any position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would I want to maximize his at bats? His MLB career thus far has resulted in a .620 OPS, over a win below replacement, and he doesn't appear to be a plus defender at any position.

People love their WAR...because he is hot at the plate, that is why. He seems to have figured something out at the plate.

WAR measures PAST performance, not future performance. WAR is the same reason everyone loves Lough despite the fact when most people watch the games they realize he doesn't have any assets other than his glove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People love their WAR...because he is hot at the plate, that is why. He seems to have figured something out at the plate.

WAR measures PAST performance, not future performance. WAR is the same reason everyone loves Lough despite the fact when most people watch the games they realize he doesn't have any assets other than his glove.

All WAR does is quantify performance. Almost everyone who dislikes WAR does the same thing in a less accurate, ad hoc manner in their own heads. For example, you can ignore the fact that Paredes has an extremely light resume if you weight his performance this spring and his handful of at bats the last few days very heavily. You really wouldn't want to write that down, since it makes no sense, so it's probably better to use in-your-head WAR in this case. Anyway, being hot at the plate has no predictive value. The only thing you can go on to continue playing Paredes is the idea that his MLB performance to date does not represent his true ability. I think his minor league performances wouldn't support that, since they're also not that impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All WAR does is quantify performance. Almost everyone who dislikes WAR does the same thing in a less accurate, ad hoc manner in their own heads. For example, you can ignore the fact that Paredes has an extremely light resume if you weight his performance this spring and his handful of at bats the last few days very heavily. You really wouldn't want to write that down, since it makes no sense, so it's probably better to use in-your-head WAR in this case. Anyway, being hot at the plate has no predictive value. The only thing you can go on to continue playing Paredes is the idea that his MLB performance to date does not represent his true ability. I think his minor league performances wouldn't support that, since they're also not that impressive.

Good thoughts. I just think the Orioles must have seen something, he looks great and he is a heck of a lot more valuable in my eyes than David Lough. We have Adam Jones emergency replacement in AAA-Borbon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thoughts. I just think the Orioles must have seen something, he looks great and he is a heck of a lot more valuable in my eyes than David Lough. We have Adam Jones emergency replacement in AAA-Borbon.

Lough has a much more impressive resume than Paredes, he's miles better with the glove and (at least so far in his MLB career) has been a much better hitter. To me Paredes is one of those guys who looks pretty impressive, might win a team field day competition, but really isn't much of a baseball player. One of Earl's rules was you don't keep a guy on the roster because he's athletic and looks good, you keep guys who have strengths you can leverage to win ballgames. Lough is a plus defender, a good runner, and a competent hitter. Paredes might not be above-team-average in anything he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the purposes of discussion, let's go with the original poster's idea that Paredes continues to hit like this for a month or more. Wieters comes off the disabled list and replaces our second catcher. Hardy comes back and either Cabrera or Flaherty are gone. Here comes Schoop. Who goes? Paredes? Delmon? Flaherty/Cabrera? Lough? Davis? Pearse?

If Paredes is only a bat, then it seems to me that the choice is between him and our other bat--Delmon. We need a reserve middle infielder. We need a reserve center fielder. Maybe if Pearse is still batting .175 we can decide to keep this year's flash-in-the-pan over last year's flash-in-the-pan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer to keep Paredes over Lough. I think Hardy replaces Lough. Worry about what to do with Schoop when he is ready to come off.

I know Paredes doesn't have the better major league track record but he has looked good going back to last summer with the Os. This team needs offense in the future and Paredes is as much an investment in the now as in the future. I would love to keep Lough but if it came down to the two, Paredes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. It should be a choice between Paredes and Young because both offer little in the field.

2. If it's a choice between Lough and Paredes lets keep in mind that Lough figures to hardly play. Even less than last year.

3. You keep playing Paredes (like Buck is going to do) until he stops hitting. If he does, he's dispensable. If he doesn't you have a 26 year old switch hitting DH for the future.

Well, he might be Steve Pearce. The 2015 Steve Pearce. It's hard to tell. I think Pearce has real power though. Don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I may be misunderstanding, but if you are suggesting that you would recall Rogers for the playoffs, then I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Baker is odd man out here, or maybe Smith, but I would definitely keep Bowman
    • A litmus test is if you'd prefer Trevor Rogers back for last guy. Tell me if it sounds crazy, but a pitcher you can sign to a minor league deal in mid-August might not be competitive with the world's greatest hitters in late September. It is fun to curate a trick pitch that works for a minute.
    • Just read two interesting tidbits - Juan Soto has battered him something like 18/35 which seemed like a lot but I guess PHI and WSN saw each other a bunch in the NL East. Also that he passed 1000 career innings.   It caught me a little by surprise he has been around that long.    Fingers crossed Bradish and Grayson in their careers can get there.    Eflin is 3rd among pitchers at age 30 and down this season. Hopping to Active Leaders to see how few pitchers attain that in this Driveline/Arm Barn era, tonight he became the 57th active pitcher to get there.     He gives us the ~162 IP we hope for in 2025, it'd go up about 20 spots.
    • Westburg, Urias, Mountcastle… Good defense, even when there’s bad defense. Westburg missed a ball that went for a hit, but I didn’t feel any foreboding, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure that that one play wouldn’t ruin the game. And it didn’t. Good pitching, even when there’s bad pitching. Eflin had never in his whole career walked 5 guys, but I wasn’t worried, for some reason. Even when Bowman had his worst outing as an oriole, I wasn’t worried, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure we’d win. And we did. Good hitting, good base running, even when Santander REALLY wanted that triple… and didn’t get it.  The fundamental baseball smarts seem to have returned, so a mistake is just a mistake. I feel really good about this team now, even though they haven’t been perfect. I really feel they’ll cover for each other, and we will enter the playoffs strong. I feel most comfortable about facing the Yankees again; they just don’t seem like a strong team, and I’m not the least bit worried about facing them again.
    • That is strong language coming from you.  The only recent guy I really couldn’t stand was Jimenez, though I sure wasn’t keen on Kimbrel for most of the season either.
    • Did you really say tonight’s game didn’t mean much? 
    • To state the obvious, the magic number for home field in the WC series is now 1, with 4 games remaining.   Would love to v close that out tomorrow va. the Yankees and then relax all weekend.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...